• SSR

    One of the things I have been doing to hoist myself out of this blah-rut that I’ve been slip-sliding around in is this: during the kids’ rest time I drag my laptop from its usual station on the dusty desk in the kitchen and carry it, life cord dangling, into the living room. I set it up on top of the little footstool, plug it in (the battery is dead and costs ninety dollars to replace but I opted to instead spend that money on a pair of luscious slippers from LL Bean and dressy black boots), and plunk myself down on the carpet in front of the blazing fire, my travel mug of coffee sitting levelly beside me on one of the children’s laid-flat library books.

    I feel pretty good right now: coffee, toasty fire, chocolate brown slippers, quiet house, and a keyboard. True, there is no internet connection in front of the fire, but that’s okay. This way I have nothing to distract me but my thoughts. This is my writing time.

    But back to the title of this post: SSR. No, it does not stand for feminism (which, by the way, I will write more about when I have finished chewing-slash-stewing). It means Sustained Silent Reading.

    I am in the process of reading several books, one of which is The Read-Aloud Handbook by Jim Trelease. I bought this book a couple years ago because I wanted access to the extensive list of recommended age-appropriate reads that made up the second part of the book, but I never read the first half of the book until now.

    I am finding the book inspiring and motivating on many fronts, but especially in the area of SSR. Trelease is a strong advocate for sustained silent reading, meaning 20-30 minutes of quiet reading each day (this happens quite naturally for homeschooled kids, but not so frequently for school kids during the school day), but it occurred to me that I don’t have sustained silent reading. Oh, I spend lots of time reading, but most of it is skim-reading. I read a short chapter of In Defense of Food, I skim the newspaper, rarely reading an article from beginning to end, I blitz through a bunch of different blogs, I read cookbooks and emails and magazine articles and stories to my children. It’s all reduced to sound bites—a little of this and a bit of that, ideas that are reduced to their bare bones, not delved into and thoroughly explored from all angles. And, sadly enough, most of it isn’t great literature.

    So last week when the kids had their rest time, I sat myself down in our new recliner (thanks, Mom and Dad) by the fireplace with a couple books. I told myself I had to read for fifteen minutes before I could go do my writing, but I ended up reading from the Handbook for twenty minutes and then I shifted to In Defense of Food for another fifteen minutes. (Yes, I chuckled at myself for not sticking with one book for the duration, but well…) When I got done reading I felt good. I had absorbed a bunch of solid ideas, delving into topics that were filled with scientific facts and well-though out theories. I comprehended what I read, and I came away smarter, more centered, and fulfilled. I had accomplished something. I had done myself a good deed.

    Since then, I have been trying to read more to myself, for extended periods of time, not just little snatches here and there. I also realized that I don’t often read novels, so I picked up several when I was at the library on Saturday. Yesterday I started Jodi Picoult’s The Tenth Circle. I’m loving learning about Dante and hell and all that jazz (really edifying, that hell stuff).

    All this to say, do you get your daily dose of SSR? What are you reading now? What would you like to be reading?

  • Just Curious…

    What is the definition of feminism? Don’t cheat and go look it up in the dictionary. I want to know what you think it is.

  • A Good Kind Of Flop

    When my mother visited us earlier this week she told Yo-Yo and Becca Boo one of her Billy and Susie stories.

    My mother started this story-telling tradition back when I only had two children, and when Sweetsie came along she added Marie Ann to the make-believe family, and then after The Baby Nickel, she added Jakey. My children beg for her dramatic stories (sometimes they involve a little play-acting on my mother’s part, so enthusiastic and flair-ish is she), so when she comes to stay with us (or vice versa) Mom usually takes over the bedtime story responsibilities.

    She schemes these stories in the car as she drives over the mountains to our house, or as was the case this last time, after we had finished dinner, right before it was time to tell the tale: I looked over at the vacated table and there was Mom, absentmindedly gnawing on her fork prongs and staring fixedly at the pumpkin cake. I thought maybe she had overdosed on the Julia Child potatoes, or that she was having an intense internal debate as to whether or not she should have a third piece of the cake, but when I gently called her name, she just grinned and said, “I’m thinking about the Billy story I’m going to tell.” Oh.

    Once in a while I put in a request for the kind of story I want since the stories tend to be chock full of important moral lessons (my mother is a very moral woman): Can you do a story about lying, please? We’ve been having a little trouble in that area. Or, The name-calling has got to stop; do a story about that, okay?

    I didn’t hear the Billy story this last time, but apparently the mama in the story (that mama is generally much more attentive to her children than I am—Mom, are you trying to tell me something?) made a cinnamon flop for breakfast because Yo-Yo Boy asked me later what a cinnamon flop was. I told him it was like a coffee cake.

    “Have I ever had one?” He asked.

    “Yes, you probably have,” I said.

    “Can you make us a cinnamon flop?” he persisted.

    “Maybe…”

    He didn’t pester me about the cinnamon flop, but he didn’t let it go, either. I could tell he was curious, and slightly confused, wondering what this floppy food could possibly be like.

    So last night after the kids were in bed I googled “Cinnamon Flop”. By then those two words had bored a hole down under my skin and had me hungering for some of that floppy cake myself, so my intentions weren’t purely altruistic. But then, you probably already caught on to the fact that I don’t make a habit of committing purely altruistic deeds—it’s not my style. Anyway, I googled up a recipe that looked both simple and yummy.


    I’m pleased to report that it was both.


    This cinnamon flop is quite similar to the Rhubarb Cake recipe, though not as rich. I like this recipe because it is a blank slate, an easy recipe to play around with: cut back on the sugar, add a glaze topping, throw in some chopped nuts or berries, play around with the spices, add more whole grains, whatever. You can’t really mess this cake up.

    You are making a flop, after all.

    Cinnamon Flop
    Adapted from some recipe I found on Google (naughty me, not taking notes—again!)

    1 cup flour
    1 cup whole wheat flour
    1 1/4 cups sugar
    3 teaspoons baking powder (is it necessary to use this much?)
    Pinch of salt
    2 teaspoons vanilla
    1 egg, beaten
    1 1/4 cups milk
    ½ cup brown sugar
    2 teaspoons cinnamon
    1/4 cup butter, melted

    Mix together the first five ingredients (the dry ones). Add the vanilla, egg, and milk. Pour the batter into a greased 9 x 13 pan. In a small bowl mix together the brown sugar and cinnamon—sprinkle it over the batter. Drizzle the melted butter over it all. Bake the cake for 20-25 minutes at 350 degrees.